science

Vehicles: Hybrid cars can use FOUR TIMES more fuel than makers claim


Plug-in hybrid electric cars can use four times more fuel than makers claim, costing owners an average of £462 per year more than expected, Which? has warned. 

The consumer watchdog tested 22 popular hybrid models over 62 miles (100km) and found that they had all been advertised with unrealistic fuel efficiency figures.

On average, hybrid cars were found to be 61 per cent less fuel-efficient than promised.

The worst offender, the BMW X5, was 72 per cent less efficient than claimed, and could cost its owner up to £669 more each year in fuel expenses.

Meanwhile the Toyota Prius, the ‘best’ of the rest, was still 39 per cent below its official fuel economy rating and could cost up to £171 more to run each year.

Which? said that their tests were tougher than the official ones, because they better represented real-world driving conditions.

A recent report from Greenpeace and Transport & Environment called hybrid cars a ‘wolf in sheep’s clothing‘, as they emit 2.5 times the CO2 in reality than in tests.

Plug-in hybrid electric cars can use four times more fuel than makers claim, costing owners up to £400 per year more than expected, Which? has warned. Pictured: the BMW X5, which Which? said is 72 per cent less efficient than advertised

Plug-in hybrid electric cars can use four times more fuel than makers claim, costing owners up to £400 per year more than expected, Which? has warned. Pictured: the BMW X5, which Which? said is 72 per cent less efficient than advertised 

HOW TO GET THE BEST FUEL ECONOMY FROM YOUR HYBRID CAR

  • Keep your journeys within the vehicle battery’s range.
  • Make sure the battery is kept charged. This will stop the combustion engine from needing to take over.
  • However, if you can keep your car charged easily and stay exclusively within the battery’s range, an all-electric car will be cheaper and cleaner to run overall.

‘A fuel-efficient plug-in hybrid vehicle is an attractive feature for prospective buyers, as many will expect to spend less on fuel and reduce their carbon footprint,’ said Which? head of home products and services, Natalie Hitchins.

‘Yet our research shows many hybrid models are not as efficient as the manufacturers claim, which means motorists could be spending more on fuel than they anticipated. 

‘It is clear that the standard set for calculating fuel consumption is flawed and should be reviewed to better reflect real-life driving conditions.

‘This would ensure manufacturers advertise more accurate figures and consumers have a better understanding of how much they should expect to spend on fuel.’ 

The fuel consumption figures advertised by car manufacturers are calculated via the so-called Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) and include consideration of the given model’s electric driving range.

This means that the miles per gallon figure achievable in real-world conditions can be much lower than the test figures, resulting in drivers consuming more fuel than they might expect.

Other poor performers in the consumer watchdog’s tests included the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer, which was found to be 71 per cent less efficient than claimed.

According to BMW, this vehicle can cover 156.9 miles per gallon (mpg), whereas Which? concluded that it could only do 44.8 mpg and would therefore cost £1,081 a year to fuel, or £772.08 more than the £309 based on the manufacturer’s mpg figure.

The Mercedes-Benz B-Class plug-in hybrid, meanwhile, was found only able to cover 78 of the promised 256 miles per gallon, adding an extra £411 to the annual fuel bill.

Annual fuel costs were calculated based on average fuel costs of 121.8p for diesel and 118.5p for petrol and an annual mileage of 9,000 — roughly the average distance travelled by respondents in the Which? annual car survey.

Other poor performers in the consumer watchdog's tests included the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (pictured) — which was found to be 71 per cent less efficient than claimed

Other poor performers in the consumer watchdog’s tests included the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (pictured) — which was found to be 71 per cent less efficient than claimed

HOW THE PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLES IN WHICH?’S TESTS COMPARED 
Brand  Model Manufacturer mpg (minimum claimed) Which? tested fuel mpg Percentage difference Annual fuel cost based on manufacturer mpg Annual fuel cost based on Which? tested mpg Cost difference
BMW X5 188.3 52.8 72% £257.62 £926.79 £669.17
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer 156.9 44.8 71% £309.18 £1,081.26 £772.08
Mercedes-Benz B-Class 235.4 78.5 67% £206.07 £617.86 £411.79
Mercedes-Benz GLE 313 104.6 67% £159.30 £476.30 £317.00
Hyundai Ioniq 256.8 91.1 65% £188.90 £532.05 £343.15
Kia X-Ceed 201.8 72.4 64% £240.39 £669.35 £428.96
Mercedes-Benz E-Class 166.2 60.1 64% £291.88 £806.65 £514.77
BMW 3 Series 176.6 65.7 63% £274.69 £738.00 £463.31
Kia Niro 201.8 74.3 63% £240.39 £652.19 £411.80
Mitsubishi Outlander 139.7 52.4 62% £347.24 £926.79 £579.55
Volkswagen Passat GTE Estate 188.3 72.4 62% £257.62 £669.35 £411.73
DS 7 Crossback E-Tense 166 65.7 60% £292.23 £738.00 £445.77
Peugeot 3008 166.2 67.3 60% £291.88 £720.84 £428.96
BMW i8 Roadster 128.4 52.3 59% £377.80 £926.79 £548.99
BMW 7-series 122.8 51.4 58% £395.03 £943.96 £548.93
Peugeot 508 SW 166.2 68.9 59% £291.88 £703.68 £411.80
Volvo XC40 117.7 49.6 58% £412.15 £978.28 £566.13
Kia Ceed SW 188.3 85.6 55% £257.62 £566.37 £308.75
Porsche Panamera 113 53.3 53% £429.29 £909.63 £480.34
Volvo XC90 83.1 42.2 49% £583.75 £1,149.91 £566.16
Volvo V60 113 60.1 47% £429.29 £806.65 £377.36
Toyota Prius 188.3 114.4 39% £257.62 £429.07 £171.45
Average 171.7 67.3 61% £308.72 £771.35 £462.63
The Mercedes-Benz B-Class plug-in hybrid (pictured), meanwhile, was found to be 67 per cent less efficient than advertised — the same as the Mercedes-Benz GLE

The Mercedes-Benz B-Class plug-in hybrid, meanwhile, was found to be 67 per cent less efficient than advertised — the same as the Mercedes-Benz GLE (pictured)

The Mercedes-Benz B-Class plug-in hybrid (left), meanwhile, was found to be 67 per cent less efficient than advertised — the same as the  Mercedes-Benz GLE (right)

‘The legally required WLTP test is designed by the international regulators to be a standardised method of comparing vehicle efficiency,’ said a BMW spokesperson.

‘These tests show clearly that plug-in hybrid electric vehicle technology, when the vehicles are charged regularly as intended, can save significant fuel consumption and emissions over the equivalent petrol or diesel models.

‘Plug-in hybrid technology is important to get customers used to electric driving and demonstrate how practical electrified driving is in every-day life.

‘Today’s PHEV technology already offers the opportunity to cover substantial parts of the daily commute, if not all of it, using only electric power, whilst having the flexibility of the combustion engine available for longer drives when required.

‘The BMW X5 plug-in hybrid, for example, can travel up to 54 miles in electric-only mode. With technology evolving and expanding charging infrastructure, the customer benefits of PHEV technology will continue to grow.’

'It is clear that the standard set for calculating fuel consumption is flawed and should be reviewed to better reflect real-life driving conditions,' said Which? head Natalie Hitchins. Pictured: the Hyundai Ioniq was 65 per cent less efficient than claimed

‘It is clear that the standard set for calculating fuel consumption is flawed and should be reviewed to better reflect real-life driving conditions,’ said Which? head Natalie Hitchins. Pictured: the Hyundai Ioniq was 65 per cent less efficient than claimed

‘We cannot comment on [Which?’s] results without understanding the methodology of [their] test — given the many factors and scenarios that can affect mpg,’ a Mercedes spokesperson told the consumer watchdog.

Which? have made public details on how they evaluate vehicle mpg figures

‘Official WLTP testing is performed in repeatable conditions and certified by government agencies — so Mercedes-Benz customers can be assured they provide accurate and comparable results,’ the spokesperson added.

‘We want our customers to benefit from and to use the full technical potential of our plug-in hybrids. We would encourage customers to charge the battery on a regular basis, for example.’

HYBRID VEHICLES EXPLAINED

A hybrid vehicle has two power sources – a petrol engine and an electric motor – combining to propel the cars forward.

By switching seamlessly between pure electric power at low speeds and efficient petrol power when speeds increase, these vehicles not only save fuel and money, but they also reduce CO2 emissions. 

Hybrids can be self-charging which means that every moment you are driving, your battery is charging, by using technology such as a regenerative braking system, which recovers energy that would normally be lost and stores it in the battery for later use.

 Self-charging hybrids do not need to be plugged in.  

A plug-in hybrid gets all the benefits of being a hybrid but also has a charge point so you can extend the range of your car by plugging in at home or at one of the nation’s electric charge points.



READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.  Learn more