politics

Tories' Covid contracts 'VIP lane' ruled unlawful by the High Court in landmark case


In a challenge brought by the Good Law Project and campaign group EveryDoctor, a judge ruled the operation of the “high priority lane” was “was in breach of the obligation of equal treatment… the illegality is marked by this judgment”

Boris Johnson claps for key workers in May 2020
Boris Johnson claps for key workers in May 2020

The Government’s use of a ‘VIP lane’ to hand out lucrative Covid contracts to two firms was unlawful, the High Court has ruled.

Billions of pounds worth of deals were handed to associates of ministers and officials during the early months of the pandemic.

In a challenge brought by the Good Law Project and campaign group EveryDoctor, a judge ruled the operation of the “high priority lane” was “was in breach of the obligation of equal treatment… the illegality is marked by this judgment.”

The groups took legal action over contracts awarded to pest control firm PestFix and the hedge fund Ayanda Capital.

In May 2021, the two campaign groups argued that millions of pounds worth of equipment, which was “useless to the NHS “, was purchased in April and May 2020 without proper technical checks, at inflated prices, as a result of the contracts provided through a “VIP lane”.

The High Court was told this lane was reserved for referrals from MPs, ministers and senior officials, adding that DHSC “then prioritised suppliers including PestFix and Ayanda because of who they knew, not what they could deliver”.

During the five-day hearing, the groups argued that “well over half” of the approximately £595 million spent with PestFix and Ayanda Capital was “wasted” on PPE which did not meet technical standards for use in the NHS.

“The outcome of all of this was a truly tragic waste of public money,” Jason Coppel QC, for the groups, told the court.

DHSC contested the claim, telling the court it “wholeheartedly” rejected the case against it.

The department’s barrister Michael Bowsher QC said the VIP lane, also known as the high-priority lane (HPL), was rational and resulted in a “large number of credible offers” in an environment where PPE deals often failed within “minutes”.

“The goal here was to try and get as much of the right PPE in as quickly as possible. That was the simple point,” Mr Bowsher said.

In a ruling handed down today, Mrs Justice O’Farrell agreed the VIP lane conferred preferential treatment on bids and sped up the process.

That meant, she said, offers were considered sooner in a process where timing was critical, and VIPs’ hands were held through the process.

She said: “Offers that were introduced through the Senior Referrers received earlier consideration at the outset of the process.

“The High Priority Lane Team was better resourced and able to respond to such offers on the same day that they arrived.”

Jo Maugham, Director of Good Law Project said: “Good Law Project revealed the red carpet-to-riches VIP lane for those with political connections in October 2020. And the Court has now held that, unsurprisingly, the lane was illegal.

“Never again should any Government treat a public health crisis as an opportunity to enrich its associates and donors at public expense.”

Dr Julia Grace Patterson, Chief Executive, EveryDoctor said: “We brought the government to court because NHS staff and other frontline workers were woefully unsupported and unprotected by this government. Many were provided with no PPE, and many died. The government must never again be allowed to conduct themselves in this manner during a national healthcare crisis”.

This breaking news story is being updated.





READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.  Learn more