Novak Djokovic permitted to leave Melbourne hotel during court hearing

The Federal Circuit Court of Australia is hearing Djokovic’s appeal against the decision to refuse him a visa ahead of the Australian Open

The hearing is ongoing

Novak Djokovic has been allowed to leave his hotel as he battles a court hearing to try to avoid being deported from Australia.

The tennis star was detained in a quarantine hotel in Melbourne after he had his visa rejected upon arrival by border control.

He had been granted a medical exemption to compete at the Australian Open but his preparations immediately took a turn for the worst, and he is now waiting the outcome of an appeal hearing to see if he can remain in the country.

The Federal Circuit Court of Australia is hearing Djokovic’s appeal against the decision to refuse him a visa ahead of the Australian Open.

The court has ruled that the player should be removed from the Park Hotel in Carlton during the hearing, while Judge Anthony Kelly has expressed agitation over the rejection of Djokovic’s medical exemption.

An order published by the court states that Djokovic be taken from the Park Hotel and brought to “a premises as specified by the applicant’s solicitors” during the hearing.

Novak Djokovic and Jelena Ristic


French Select)

The order states: “The respondent, by her servants or agents, including the Australian Border Force, take all steps and do all things as may be necessary to bring the applicant to premises as specified by the applicant’s solicitors on Monday, 10 January 2022 (and each day thereafter, including upon the delivery of judgment), to permit him to remain there until the conclusion of each hearing and to secure his safe return to detention upon the conclusion of each hearing.”

After the hearing was delayed due to technical issues with the court’s video link, Djokovic’s lawyers began arguing their case to Judge Kelly, who asked the court “What more could this man have done?” and said he was “agitated” about the issue.

“Here, a professor and an eminently qualified physician have produced and provided to the applicant a medical exemption,” Judge Kelly said.

“Further to that, that medical exemption and the basis on which it was given was separately given by a further independent expert specialist panel established by the Victorian state government and that document was in the hands of the delegate.”

Djokovic’s lawyer, Nicholas Wood, has argued the notice of intention to cancel the visa was defective because it was made on “a confusing blend of two grounds”.

He also argued that Djokovic was treated at the airport as if access to lawyers “couldn’t possibly” be of assistance in the matter.

The Federal Circuit Court of Australia is hearing Djokovic’s appeal


AFP via Getty Images)

It was revealed in court documents submitted by Djokovic’s lawyers that the ace had been infected with Covid-19 in December 2021.

The documents said the infection was the basis of Djokovic’s medical exemption.

The documents also noted that Djokovic expressed “shock, surprise, and confusion” when he was notified of his visa cancellation “given that (as he understood it) he had done everything he was required to enter Australia”.

But Australia’s Home Affairs Department filed court documents in which it stated “there is no such thing as an assurance of entry by a non-citizen into Australia” and noted that the Minister has the power to cancel Djokovic’s visa a second time if the court rules in his favour.

“As the Court raised with the parties at a previous mention, if this Court were to make orders in the applicant’s favour, it would then be for the respondent to administer the Act in accordance with law.

“That may involve the delegate deciding whether to make another cancellation decision, but there are also other powers in the Act, as the Court would be aware.”

Read More

Read More


Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.  Learn more