finance

Don’t run scared of pension savings limits


In the past few weeks two of my clients have paid tax charges running into hundreds of thousands for breaching the pensions lifetime allowance.

Numbers released last week show that 7,130 people paid £283m between them in 2018-19 for similar breaches. This looks set to be a big earner for the HM Revenue & Customs in the coming years, particularly if chancellor Rishi Sunak fulfils whispered threats to reduce the allowance further, to either £900,000 or £800,000. 

Many people approaching the current limit of £1,073,100 are questioning what to do. (That includes anyone with a final salary pension of close to £53,655, because HMRC calculates the value of these pensions by multiplying the “defined benefit” by 20.)

The lifetime allowance (LTA) is the amount you can accumulate in pension savings over your lifetime without incurring a tax charge. The charge is 25 per cent on any money exceeding the allowance that you elect to withdraw as income (on top of any income tax you might pay) and 55 per cent on any money you draw as a lump sum (with no income tax to pay). Drawing on your pension is known as “crystallising” it. If you leave your pension savings untouched (or uncrystallised) there will be a test for the charge when you reach 75 or if you die before then.

The immediate response of many savers is to focus on avoiding the charges by keeping their pension savings below the ceiling. But is this wise?

Many suggest you stop paying contributions if you are nearing the limit — or prospective limits — but I would be wary of doing that too soon. Illness or redundancy may force you to retire early, in which case you would have needlessly stopped saving tax efficiently, and rates of relief may not always be so generous as today. Money in your pension grows free of tax and is free of inheritance tax (IHT) when you die. These can be substantial benefits.

See also  M&G Investments chief executive steps down

There are several scenarios where ceasing contributions might be counterproductive.

If your employer is paying into your pension and will not give you the benefit any other way then you might as well continue to take it, even though you may be taxed punitively. It’s better than nothing! But do ask if your employer will pay it as taxable income instead.

If you are a higher-rate taxpayer and salary sacrificing, you save 40 per cent income tax and the 2 per cent national insurance (NI) charge. So you enjoy a 42 per cent benefit. Your employer saves 13.8 per cent in NI as well, and some will add this to your pension contribution — bringing the tax saving to over 55 per cent.

If your salary is between £100,000 and £125,140 then you are effectively being taxed at 60 per cent, because for every two pounds you earn above £100,000 you lose one pound of your personal allowance. So if your taxable income, after allowing for charitable donations, is over £100,000 you might consider paying this element into your pension fund.

If you own your own company, pension contributions on your behalf come off the company profits. They reduce your corporation tax bill, making it an effective way to take profits tax efficiently. Again, there are NI savings.

If you have earmarked your pension savings for your children you can grow them tax efficiently. At 75, if you have any benefits you have not accessed, you will pay the 25 per cent charge on anything over the LTA. The remaining fund then passes to your children on your death free of IHT (usually payable at 40 per cent). They pay income tax at their marginal rate of tax on any withdrawals. That is not a bad deal. Withdrawals are free of income tax if you die before 75.

See also  UK’s organic food growers aim for a bigger slice of pie

It is worth pointing out that there are various forms of LTA protection, which means you may be entitled to a higher LTA than the standard rate. If you (or anybody on your behalf) have not made any contributions to a pension since April 5 2016 then you may be able to claim a personal LTA of £1,250,000 in the form of Fixed Protection 2016, assuming you were a member of a suitable scheme.

Those close to the limit and over 55 may consider taking the 25 per cent tax-free lump sum — a benefit that may not last for ever either. The growth on this money will not then be subject to these charges, but if the money is invested in assets outside an Isa, you may face capital gains tax on future disposals. And the money does not have the IHT benefit of a pension.

You can take taxable income from your pension each year to prevent it from breaching the LTA — or at least mitigate any final LTA bill — if you manage your pension carefully. But be warned, once you start taking income any future pension contributions are limited to £4,000 a year.

Even if you restrict contributions and withdraw capital you may breach the limit, simply through growth — and especially if the allowance is reduced. If it falls to £800,000 then someone with £500,000 in pension savings, generating 7 per cent a year net returns on their portfolio, will hit the ceiling in seven years (at the current allowance level it is 11 years and four months). Dial down your risk and bring returns to 3 per cent and it will be 15 years and 11 months before you breach the limits (25 years and 11 months at today’s limit).

See also  Asia stocks lifted by China-U.S. trade hopes; oil resumes retreat

You might want to look at your savings as a whole and have lower-risk elements in your pension, leaving your Isas to do the grunt work for returns. But I would warn against being too cautious in your pension just to avoid tax. That smacks of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Some investors who have breached the limits may even be tempted to increase their risk, because the impact of losses is mitigated by the tax savings that come with them.

Those clients I mentioned earlier were lucky — they had secured fixed protection to ensure they enjoyed the old limit of £1.8m. The tax is paid out of the pension fund so they did not have to find it from elsewhere. And they knew what was coming. It has not stopped us managing their money for growth. They saw the charge as a tax on success. But, of course, it hurt.

This is fiendishly complex and there are numerous factors to take into consideration when deciding your own response. You might ask why any chancellor ever thought such a charge sensible. It is surely simpler to limit how much people put into their pension and the rate of tax relief, rather than penalising their success at investing money wisely.

But we live with what we are given. For people with pension savings approaching the limits there are significant costs to mismanaging your pensions — or big savings from managing their strategy correctly. It’s worth taking the time to make the right choices.

Charles Calkin is a financial planner at wealth manager James Hambro & Partners



READ SOURCE

Leave a Reply

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.  Learn more