Premier League clubs should have been banned from buying and selling players this summer with monies instead redirected to the EFL sides fighting for their lives.
That’s the view of former Liverpool and Nottingham Forest star Stan Collymore, who finds it obscene that the country’s biggest clubs have lavished more than £1billion — and counting — at a time when the coronavirus crisis is pushing some of our smaller clubs to the brink of their existence.
Chelsea, in particular, have spent big with Kai Havertz and Timo Werner helping to take their outlay to well in excess of £200m.
And Manchester United could yet spend more than £100m on one player, Jadon Sancho, before the transfer window closes on Monday night.
Collymore is adamant that is wrong and insists top-flight clubs should be doing everything they can for those lower down the food chain.
He said: “There are plenty of things to laud about what has been done to make the Premier League arguably the best in the world but I don’t see any leadership when the **** hits the fan.
“We had Liverpool and Tottenham asking to furlough workers just a few months ago yet now they are bringing in players earning £100,000-plus a week, more than double that in some cases, and how can that work?
“There should have been a moratorium on transfers in the Premier League.
“It should have been a case of, ‘Right, does everybody have 25 players they can use in their squad? Great, well in that case, there will be no ins or outs this season because we are all concerned about our finances and this way there’s enough in the coffers with billionaire owners and TV monies still coming in to help keep all 91 clubs afloat’.
It has been a hectic and unique transfer window so far – so make sure you don’t miss a single thing by signing up for the brilliant new Mirror Football newsletter!
You’ll been clued up on Jadon Sancho, Declan Rice and more as clubs buy their way through the summer. All the latest transfer news and big stories will land straight into your inbox. You won’t miss out.
To sign up, put your email at the top of this article or follow the instructions on this link.
“That would have set the right tone for the country, the same tone Marcus Rashford has been setting as an individual and the same tone many Britons have been setting by volunteering in a whole number of ways to help others less fortunate out at a time when they have needed it most.
“People will argue that you don’t see Tesco bailing out Hog’s Butchers on the High Street, so why should Premier League clubs help out other football clubs.
“But the difference is, unlike football clubs, Tesco exists in its own world.
“Football clubs need each other to play against and it doesn’t matter what tier an outfit is in, they’re all giving to the eco-system of the game.
“Take League One clubs Sunderland and Swindon, for example.
“The Premier League wouldn’t be what it is today without the contribution they have made to it over the years, and the same goes for many other clubs as well.
“So why shouldn’t the current crop of ‘shareholders’ look out for those who have helped pave the way for the riches on offer today?
“Those with the richest owners would also do well to remember that, if the families or states who own them now decide one day to walk away, that there next time there’s a global pandemic and finances are being crippled, they might not be in such a privileged position.
“This would have been the perfect time for the Premier League to show real solidarity with the rest of our game.”